|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
Data corrente: |
31/10/2019 |
Data da última atualização: |
04/11/2019 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
PHILLIPS, H. R. P.; GUERRA, C. A.; BARTZ, M. L. C.; BRIONES, M. J. I.; BROWN, G. G.; CROWTHER, T. W.; FERLIAN, O.; GONGALSKY, K. B.; VAN DEN HOOGEN, J.; KREBS, J.; ORGIAZZI, A.; ROUTH, D.; SCHWARZ, B.; BACH, E. M.; BENNETT, J.; BROSE, U.; DECAËNS, T.; KÖNIG-RIES, B.; LOREAU, M.; MATHIEU, J.; MULDER, C.; VAN DER PUTTEN, W. H.; RAMIREZ, K. S.; RILLIG, M. C.; RUSSELL, D.; RUTGERS, M.; THAKUR, M. P.; VRIES, F. T. de; WALL, D. H.; WARDLE, D. A.; ARAI, M.; AYUKE, F. O.; BAKER, G. H.; BEAUSÉJOUR, R.; BEDANO, J. C.; BIRKHOFER, K.; BLANCHART, E.; BLOSSEY, B.; BOLGER, T.; BRADLEY, R. L.; CALLAHAM, M. A.; CAPOWIEZ, Y.; CAULFIELD, M. E.; CHOI, A.; CROTTY, F. V.; DÁVALOS, A.; DIAZ COSIN, D. J.; DOMINGUEZ, A.; ESTEBAN DUHOUR, A.; VAN EEKEREN, N.; EMMERLING, C.; FALCO, L. B.; FERNÁNDEZ, R.; FONTE, S. J.; FRAGOSO, C.; FRANCO, A. L. C.; FUGÈRE, M.; FUSILERO, A. T.; GHOLAMI, S.; GUNDALE, M. J.; GUTIÉRREZ LÓPEZ, M.; HACKENBERGER, D. K.; HERNÁNDEZ, L. M.; HISHI, T.; HOLDSWORTH, A. R.; HOLMSTRUP, M.; HOPFENSPERGER, K. N.; HUERTA LWANGA, E.; HUHTA, V.; HURISSO, T. T.; IANNONE III, B. V.; IORDACHE, M.; JOSCHKO, M.; KANEKO, N.; KANIANSKA, R.; KEITH, A. M.; KELLY, C. A.; KERNECKER, M. L.; KLAMINDER, J.; KONÉ, A. W.; KOOCH, Y.; KUKKONEN, S. T.; LALTHANZARA, H.; LAMMEL, D. R.; LEBEDEV, I. M.; LI, Y.; JESUS LIDON, J. B.; LINCOLN, N. K.; LOSS, S. R.; MARICHAL, R.; MATULA, R.; MOOS, J. H.; MORENO, G.; MORÓN-RÍOS, A.; MUYS, B.; NEIRYNCK, J.; NORGROVE, L.; NOVO, M.; NUUTINEN, V.; NUZZO, V.; MUJEEB RAHMAN, P.; PANSU, J.; PAUDEL, S.; PÉRÈS, G.; PÉREZ-CAMACHO, L.; PIÑEIRO, R.; PONGE, J.-F.; RASHID, M. I.; REBOLLO, S.; RODEIRO-IGLESIAS, J.; RODRÍGUEZ, M. Á.; ROTH, A. M.; ROUSSEAU, G. X.; ROZEN, A.; SAYAD, E.; VAN SCHAIK, L.; SCHARENBROCH, B. C.; SCHIRRMANN, M.; SCHMIDT, O.; SCHRÖDER, B.; SEEBER, J.; SHASHKOV, M. P.; SINGH, J.; SMITH, S. M.; STEINWANDTER, M.; TALAVERA, J. A.; TRIGO, D.; TSUKAMOTO, J.; VALENÇA, A. W. de; VANEK, S. J.; VIRTO, I.; WACKETT, A. A.; WARREN, M. W.; WEHR, N. H.; WHALEN, J. K.; WIRONEN, M. B.; WOLTERS, V.; ZENKOVA, I. V.; ZHANG, W.; CAMERON, E. K.; EISENHAUER, N. |
Afiliação: |
HELEN R. P. PHILLIPS, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research; CARLOS A. GUERRA, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research; MARIE L. C. BARTZ, Universidade Positivo; MARIA J. I. BRIONES, Universidad de Vigo; GEORGE GARDNER BROWN, CNPF; THOMAS W. CROWTHER, Institute of Integrative Biology; OLGA FERLIAN, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research; KONSTANTIN B. GONGALSKY, Russian Academy of Sciences; JOHAN VAN DEN HOOGEN, Institute of Integrative Biology; JULIA KREBS, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research; ALBERTO ORGIAZZI, European Commission, Joint Research Centre; DEVIN ROUTH, Institute of Integrative Biology; BENJAMIN SCHWARZ, University of Freiburg; ELIZABETH M. BACH, Colorado State University; JOANNE BENNETT, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research; ULRICH BROSE, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research; THIBAUD DECAËNS, CEFE, UMR 5175, CNRS?Univ Montpellier?Univ Paul?Valéry?EPHE?SupAgro Montpellier?INRA?IRD; BIRGITTA KÖNIG-RIES, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research; MICHEL LOREAU, Centre for Biodiversity Theory and Modeling; JÉRÔME MATHIEU, Sorbonne Université; CHRISTIAN MULDER, University of Catania; WIM H. VAN DER PUTTEN, Netherlands Institute of Ecology; KELLY S. RAMIREZ, Netherlands Institute of Ecology; MATTHIAS C. RILLIG, Berlin-Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research; DAVID RUSSELL, Senckenberg Museum for Natural History Görlitz; MICHIEL RUTGERS, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment; MADHAV P. THAKUR, Netherlands Institute of Ecology; FRANCISKA T. DE VRIES, University of Amsterdam; DIANA H. WALL, Colorado State University; DAVID A. WARDLE, Nanyang Technological University; MIWA ARAI, Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences; FREDRICK O. AYUKE, University of Nairobi; GEOFF H. BAKER, CSIRO Health and Biosecurity; ROBIN BEAUSÉJOUR, Université de Sherbrooke; JOSÉ C. BEDANO, National University of Río Cuarto; KLAUS BIRKHOFER, Brandenburg University of Technology; ERIC BLANCHART, University of Montpellier; BERND BLOSSEY, Cornell University; THOMAS BOLGER, University College Dublin; ROBERT L. BRADLEY, Université de Sherbrooke; MAC A. CALLAHAM, USDA Forest Service; YVAN CAPOWIEZ, INRA, Site Agroparc; MARK E. CAULFIELD, Wageningen University and Research; AMY CHOI, University of Toronto; FELICITY V. CROTTY, Aberystwyth University; ANDREA DÁVALOS, Cornell University; DARÍO J. DIAZ COSIN, Complutense University of Madrid; ANAHÍ DOMINGUEZ, National University of Río Cuarto; ANDRÉS ESTEBAN DUHOUR, Universidad Nacional de Luján; NICK VAN EEKEREN, Louis Bolk Institute; CHRISTOPH EMMERLING, University of Trier; LILIANA B. FALCO, Universidad Nacional de Luján; ROSA FERNÁNDEZ, Institute of Evolutionary Biology; STEVEN J. FONTE, Colorado State University; CARLOS FRAGOSO, Instituto de Ecología A.C; ANDRÉ L. C. FRANCO, Colorado State University; MARTINE FUGÈRE, Université de SherbrookE; ABEGAIL T. FUSILERO, University of the Philippines–Mindanao; SHAIESTE GHOLAMI, Razi University; MICHAEL J. GUNDALE, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; MÓNICA GUTIÉRREZ LÓPEZ, Complutense University of Madrid; DAVORKA K. HACKENBERGER, J. J. Strossmayer University of Osijek; LUIS M. HERNÁNDEZ, Postgraduate Program in Agroecology, Maranhão State University; TAKUO HISHI, Kyushu University; ANDREW R. HOLDSWORTH, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency; MARTIN HOLMSTRUP, Aarhus University; KRISTINE N. HOPFENSPERGER, Northern Kentucky University; ESPERANZA HUERTA LWANGA, Colegio de la Frontera Sur; VEIKKO HUHTA, University of Jyväskylä; TUNSISA T. HURISSO, Colorado State University; BASIL V. IANNONE III, University of Florida; MADALINA IORDACHE, Banat’s University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine “King Michael the 1st of Romania"; MONIKA JOSCHKO, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research; NOBUHIRO KANEKO, Fukushima University; RADOSLAVA KANIANSKA, Matej Bel University; AIDAN M. KEITH, Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; COURTLAND A. KELLY, Colorado State University; MARIA L. KERNECKER, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research; JONATAN KLAMINDER, Umeå University; ARMAND W. KONÉ, Université Nangui Abrogoua; YAHYA KOOCH, Tarbiat Modares University; SANNA T. KUKKONEN, Natural Resources Institute Finland; H. LALTHANZARA, Pachhunga University College; DANIEL R. LAMMEL, Freie Universität Berlin; IURII M. LEBEDEV, Russian Academy of Sciences; YIQING LI, University of Hawaii; JUAN B. JESUS LIDON, Complutense University of Madrid; NOA K. LINCOLN, University of Hawaii at M?noa; SCOTT R. LOSS, Oklahoma State University; RAPHAEL MARICHAL, CIRAD, Univ Montpellier; RADIM MATULA, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague; JAN HENDRIK MOOS, Forest Research Institute of Baden-Wuerttemberg; GERARDO MORENO, University of Extremadura; ALEJANDRO MORÓN-RÍOS, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur; BART MUYS, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven; JOHAN NEIRYNCK, Research Institute for Nature and Forest; LINDSEY NORGROVE, Bern University of Applied Sciences; MARTA NOVO, Complutense University of Madrid; VISA NUUTINEN, Natural Resources Institute Finland; VICTORIA NUZZO, Natural Area Consultants; MUJEEB RAHMAN P, Pocker Sahib Memorial Orphanage College; JOHAN PANSU, CSIRO Ocean and Atmosphere; SHISHIR PAUDEL, Oklahoma State University; GUÉNOLA PÉRÈS, INRA, Agrocampus Ouest; LORENZO PÉREZ-CAMACHO, University of Alcalá; RAÚL PIÑEIRO, University of Vigo; JEAN-FRANÇOIS PONGE, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle; MUHAMMAD IMTIAZ RASHID, King Abdulaziz University; SALVADOR REBOLLO, University of Alcalá; JAVIER RODEIRO-IGLESIAS, Universidad de Vigo; MIGUEL Á. RODRÍGUEZ104, University of Alcalá; ALEXANDER M. ROTH, University of Minnesota; GUILLAUME X. ROUSSEAU58, Postgraduate Program in Agroecology, Maranhão State University; ANNA ROZEN, Jagiellonian University; EHSAN SAYAD, Razi University; LOES VAN SCHAIK, Technical University of Berlin; BRYANT C. SCHARENBROCH, University of Wisconsin; MICHAEL SCHIRRMANN, Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy; OLAF SCHMIDT, University College Dublin; BORIS SCHRÖDER, Berlin-Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research; JULIA SEEBER, University of Innsbruck; MAXIM P. SHASHKOV, Russian Academy of Science; JASWINDER SINGH, Post Graduate Department of Zoology, Khalsa College Amritsar; SANDY M. SMITH, University of Toronto; MICHAEL STEINWANDTER, Institute for Alpine Environment, Eurac Research; JOSÉ A. TALAVERA, University of La Laguna; DOLORES TRIGO, Complutense University of Madrid; JIRO TSUKAMOTO, Kochi University; ANNE W. DE VALENÇA, Food and Agriculture, WWF-Netherlands; STEVEN J. VANEK, Colorado State University; IÑIGO VIRTO, Universidad Pública de Navarra; ADRIAN A. WACKETT, University of Minnesota; MATTHEW W. WARREN, Earth Innovation Institute; NATHANIEL H. WEHR, University of Hawai‘i at M?noa; JOANN K. WHALEN, McGill University; MICHAEL B. WIRONEN, The Nature Conservancy; VOLKMAR WOLTERS, Justus Liebig University; IRINA V. ZENKOVA, Institute of the North Industrial Ecology Problems; WEIXIN ZHANG, Henan University; ERIN K. CAMERON, Saint Mary’s University; NICO EISENHAUER, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research. |
Título: |
Global distribution of earthworm diversity. |
Ano de publicação: |
2019 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Science, v. 366, n. 6464, p. 480-485, Oct. 2019. |
DOI: |
10.1126/science.aax4851 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Soil organisms, including earthworms, are a key component of terrestrial ecosystems. However, little is known about their diversity, their distribution, and the threats affecting them. We compiled a global dataset of sampled earthworm communities from 6928 sites in 57 countries as a basis for predicting patterns in earthworm diversity, abundance, and biomass. We found that local species richness and abundance typically peaked at higher latitudes, displaying patterns opposite to those observed in aboveground organisms. However, high species dissimilarity across tropical locations may cause diversity across the entirety of the tropics to be higher than elsewhere. Climate variables were found to be more important in shaping earthworm communities than soil properties or habitat cover. These findings suggest that climate change may have serious implications for earthworm communities and for the functions they provide. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Earthworm; Soil property; Species richness. |
Thesagro: |
Biodiversidade; Distribuição Geográfica; Minhoca; Mudança Climática. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Biodiversity; Climate change; Tropics. |
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
Marc: |
LEADER 05810naa a2201933 a 4500 001 2113679 005 2019-11-04 008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1126/science.aax4851$2DOI 100 1 $aPHILLIPS, H. R. P. 245 $aGlobal distribution of earthworm diversity.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2019 520 $aSoil organisms, including earthworms, are a key component of terrestrial ecosystems. However, little is known about their diversity, their distribution, and the threats affecting them. We compiled a global dataset of sampled earthworm communities from 6928 sites in 57 countries as a basis for predicting patterns in earthworm diversity, abundance, and biomass. We found that local species richness and abundance typically peaked at higher latitudes, displaying patterns opposite to those observed in aboveground organisms. However, high species dissimilarity across tropical locations may cause diversity across the entirety of the tropics to be higher than elsewhere. Climate variables were found to be more important in shaping earthworm communities than soil properties or habitat cover. These findings suggest that climate change may have serious implications for earthworm communities and for the functions they provide. 650 $aBiodiversity 650 $aClimate change 650 $aTropics 650 $aBiodiversidade 650 $aDistribuição Geográfica 650 $aMinhoca 650 $aMudança Climática 653 $aEarthworm 653 $aSoil property 653 $aSpecies richness 700 1 $aGUERRA, C. A. 700 1 $aBARTZ, M. L. C. 700 1 $aBRIONES, M. J. I. 700 1 $aBROWN, G. G. 700 1 $aCROWTHER, T. W. 700 1 $aFERLIAN, O. 700 1 $aGONGALSKY, K. B. 700 1 $aVAN DEN HOOGEN, J. 700 1 $aKREBS, J. 700 1 $aORGIAZZI, A. 700 1 $aROUTH, D. 700 1 $aSCHWARZ, B. 700 1 $aBACH, E. M. 700 1 $aBENNETT, J. 700 1 $aBROSE, U. 700 1 $aDECAËNS, T. 700 1 $aKÖNIG-RIES, B. 700 1 $aLOREAU, M. 700 1 $aMATHIEU, J. 700 1 $aMULDER, C. 700 1 $aVAN DER PUTTEN, W. H. 700 1 $aRAMIREZ, K. S. 700 1 $aRILLIG, M. C. 700 1 $aRUSSELL, D. 700 1 $aRUTGERS, M. 700 1 $aTHAKUR, M. P. 700 1 $aVRIES, F. T. de 700 1 $aWALL, D. H. 700 1 $aWARDLE, D. A. 700 1 $aARAI, M. 700 1 $aAYUKE, F. O. 700 1 $aBAKER, G. H. 700 1 $aBEAUSÉJOUR, R. 700 1 $aBEDANO, J. C. 700 1 $aBIRKHOFER, K. 700 1 $aBLANCHART, E. 700 1 $aBLOSSEY, B. 700 1 $aBOLGER, T. 700 1 $aBRADLEY, R. L. 700 1 $aCALLAHAM, M. A. 700 1 $aCAPOWIEZ, Y. 700 1 $aCAULFIELD, M. E. 700 1 $aCHOI, A. 700 1 $aCROTTY, F. V. 700 1 $aDÁVALOS, A. 700 1 $aDIAZ COSIN, D. J. 700 1 $aDOMINGUEZ, A. 700 1 $aESTEBAN DUHOUR, A. 700 1 $aVAN EEKEREN, N. 700 1 $aEMMERLING, C. 700 1 $aFALCO, L. B. 700 1 $aFERNÁNDEZ, R. 700 1 $aFONTE, S. J. 700 1 $aFRAGOSO, C. 700 1 $aFRANCO, A. L. C. 700 1 $aFUGÈRE, M. 700 1 $aFUSILERO, A. T. 700 1 $aGHOLAMI, S. 700 1 $aGUNDALE, M. J. 700 1 $aGUTIÉRREZ LÓPEZ, M. 700 1 $aHACKENBERGER, D. K. 700 1 $aHERNÁNDEZ, L. M. 700 1 $aHISHI, T. 700 1 $aHOLDSWORTH, A. R. 700 1 $aHOLMSTRUP, M. 700 1 $aHOPFENSPERGER, K. N. 700 1 $aHUERTA LWANGA, E. 700 1 $aHUHTA, V. 700 1 $aHURISSO, T. T. 700 1 $aIANNONE III, B. V. 700 1 $aIORDACHE, M. 700 1 $aJOSCHKO, M. 700 1 $aKANEKO, N. 700 1 $aKANIANSKA, R. 700 1 $aKEITH, A. M. 700 1 $aKELLY, C. A. 700 1 $aKERNECKER, M. L. 700 1 $aKLAMINDER, J. 700 1 $aKONÉ, A. W. 700 1 $aKOOCH, Y. 700 1 $aKUKKONEN, S. T. 700 1 $aLALTHANZARA, H. 700 1 $aLAMMEL, D. R. 700 1 $aLEBEDEV, I. M. 700 1 $aLI, Y. 700 1 $aJESUS LIDON, J. B. 700 1 $aLINCOLN, N. K. 700 1 $aLOSS, S. R. 700 1 $aMARICHAL, R. 700 1 $aMATULA, R. 700 1 $aMOOS, J. H. 700 1 $aMORENO, G. 700 1 $aMORÓN-RÍOS, A. 700 1 $aMUYS, B. 700 1 $aNEIRYNCK, J. 700 1 $aNORGROVE, L. 700 1 $aNOVO, M. 700 1 $aNUUTINEN, V. 700 1 $aNUZZO, V. 700 1 $aMUJEEB RAHMAN, P. 700 1 $aPANSU, J. 700 1 $aPAUDEL, S. 700 1 $aPÉRÈS, G. 700 1 $aPÉREZ-CAMACHO, L. 700 1 $aPIÑEIRO, R. 700 1 $aPONGE, J.-F. 700 1 $aRASHID, M. I. 700 1 $aREBOLLO, S. 700 1 $aRODEIRO-IGLESIAS, J. 700 1 $aRODRÍGUEZ, M. Á. 700 1 $aROTH, A. M. 700 1 $aROUSSEAU, G. X. 700 1 $aROZEN, A. 700 1 $aSAYAD, E. 700 1 $aVAN SCHAIK, L. 700 1 $aSCHARENBROCH, B. C. 700 1 $aSCHIRRMANN, M. 700 1 $aSCHMIDT, O. 700 1 $aSCHRÖDER, B. 700 1 $aSEEBER, J. 700 1 $aSHASHKOV, M. P. 700 1 $aSINGH, J. 700 1 $aSMITH, S. M. 700 1 $aSTEINWANDTER, M. 700 1 $aTALAVERA, J. A. 700 1 $aTRIGO, D. 700 1 $aTSUKAMOTO, J. 700 1 $aVALENÇA, A. W. de 700 1 $aVANEK, S. J. 700 1 $aVIRTO, I. 700 1 $aWACKETT, A. A. 700 1 $aWARREN, M. W. 700 1 $aWEHR, N. H. 700 1 $aWHALEN, J. K. 700 1 $aWIRONEN, M. B. 700 1 $aWOLTERS, V. 700 1 $aZENKOVA, I. V. 700 1 $aZHANG, W. 700 1 $aCAMERON, E. K. 700 1 $aEISENHAUER, N. 773 $tScience$gv. 366, n. 6464, p. 480-485, Oct. 2019.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Soja. |
Data corrente: |
06/11/2015 |
Data da última atualização: |
20/06/2017 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
Autoria: |
NIEMEYER, J. C.; MOREIRA-SANTOS, M.; RIBEIRO, R.; RUTGERS, M.; NOGUEIRA, M. A.; SILVA, E. M. da; SOUSA, J. P. |
Afiliação: |
JÚLIA CARINA NIEMEYER, UFSC; MATILDE MOREIRA SANTOS, University of Coimbra; RUI RIBEIRO, University of Coimbra; MICHIEL RUTGERS, RIVM - The Netherlands; MARCO ANTONIO NOGUEIRA, CNPSO; EDUARDO MENDES DA SILVA, UFBA; JOSÉ PAULO SOUSA, University of Coimbra. |
Título: |
Ecological risk assessment of a metal-contaminated area in the tropics. Tier II: detailed assessment. |
Ano de publicação: |
2015 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Plos One, v. 10, n. 11, p. 1-25, Nov. 2015. |
ISSN: |
1932-6203 |
DOI: |
10.1371/journal.pone.0141772 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
This study presents data on the detailed evaluation (tier 2) of a site-specific ecological risk assessment (ssERA) in a former smelter area contaminated with metals (Santo Amaro, Bahia, Brazil). Combining information from three lines of evidence (LoE), chemical (Chem-LoE), ecotoxicological (EcotoxLoE) and ecological (EcoLoE), in the Triad approach, integrated risk values were calculated to rank sites and confirm the potential risk disclosed with tier 1. Risk values were calculated for the habitat and for the retention functions in each sampling point. Habitat function included the ChemLoE calculated from total metal concentrations. The EcotoxLoE was based on reproduction tests with terrestrial invertebrates (Folsomia candida, Enchytraeus crypticus, Eisenia andrei), shoot length and plant biomass (Avena sativa, Brassica rapa). For the EcoLoE, ecological parameters (microbial parameters, soil invertebrate community, litter breakdown) were used to derive risk values. Retention function included the ChemLoE, calculated from extractable metal concentrations, and the EcotoxLoE based on eluate tests with aquatic organisms (Daphnia magna reproduction and Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata growth). Results related to the habitat function indicated that the metal residues are sufficient to cause risk to biota, while the low metal levels in extracts and the general lack of toxicity in aquatic tests indicated a high soil retention capacity in most sampling points. Integrated risk of tier 2 showed the same trend of tier 1, suggesting the need to proceed with remediation actions. The high risk levels were related to direct toxicity to organisms and indirect effects, such as failure in the establishment of vegetation and the consequent loss of habitat quality for microorganisms and soil fauna. This study shed some light on the selection of tools for the tier 2 of an ssERA in tropical metal-contaminated sites, focusing on ecological receptors at risk and using available chemical methods, ecological surveys and ecotoxicity tests. MenosThis study presents data on the detailed evaluation (tier 2) of a site-specific ecological risk assessment (ssERA) in a former smelter area contaminated with metals (Santo Amaro, Bahia, Brazil). Combining information from three lines of evidence (LoE), chemical (Chem-LoE), ecotoxicological (EcotoxLoE) and ecological (EcoLoE), in the Triad approach, integrated risk values were calculated to rank sites and confirm the potential risk disclosed with tier 1. Risk values were calculated for the habitat and for the retention functions in each sampling point. Habitat function included the ChemLoE calculated from total metal concentrations. The EcotoxLoE was based on reproduction tests with terrestrial invertebrates (Folsomia candida, Enchytraeus crypticus, Eisenia andrei), shoot length and plant biomass (Avena sativa, Brassica rapa). For the EcoLoE, ecological parameters (microbial parameters, soil invertebrate community, litter breakdown) were used to derive risk values. Retention function included the ChemLoE, calculated from extractable metal concentrations, and the EcotoxLoE based on eluate tests with aquatic organisms (Daphnia magna reproduction and Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata growth). Results related to the habitat function indicated that the metal residues are sufficient to cause risk to biota, while the low metal levels in extracts and the general lack of toxicity in aquatic tests indicated a high soil retention capacity in most sampling points. Integrated risk of tier 2... Mostrar Tudo |
Thesagro: |
Contaminação; Metal; Toxidez. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Environmental assessment. |
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/132633/1/2015-PLOS-ONE-Niemeyer-et-al.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02816naa a2200265 a 4500 001 2028099 005 2017-06-20 008 2015 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a1932-6203 024 7 $a10.1371/journal.pone.0141772$2DOI 100 1 $aNIEMEYER, J. C. 245 $aEcological risk assessment of a metal-contaminated area in the tropics. Tier II$bdetailed assessment.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2015 520 $aThis study presents data on the detailed evaluation (tier 2) of a site-specific ecological risk assessment (ssERA) in a former smelter area contaminated with metals (Santo Amaro, Bahia, Brazil). Combining information from three lines of evidence (LoE), chemical (Chem-LoE), ecotoxicological (EcotoxLoE) and ecological (EcoLoE), in the Triad approach, integrated risk values were calculated to rank sites and confirm the potential risk disclosed with tier 1. Risk values were calculated for the habitat and for the retention functions in each sampling point. Habitat function included the ChemLoE calculated from total metal concentrations. The EcotoxLoE was based on reproduction tests with terrestrial invertebrates (Folsomia candida, Enchytraeus crypticus, Eisenia andrei), shoot length and plant biomass (Avena sativa, Brassica rapa). For the EcoLoE, ecological parameters (microbial parameters, soil invertebrate community, litter breakdown) were used to derive risk values. Retention function included the ChemLoE, calculated from extractable metal concentrations, and the EcotoxLoE based on eluate tests with aquatic organisms (Daphnia magna reproduction and Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata growth). Results related to the habitat function indicated that the metal residues are sufficient to cause risk to biota, while the low metal levels in extracts and the general lack of toxicity in aquatic tests indicated a high soil retention capacity in most sampling points. Integrated risk of tier 2 showed the same trend of tier 1, suggesting the need to proceed with remediation actions. The high risk levels were related to direct toxicity to organisms and indirect effects, such as failure in the establishment of vegetation and the consequent loss of habitat quality for microorganisms and soil fauna. This study shed some light on the selection of tools for the tier 2 of an ssERA in tropical metal-contaminated sites, focusing on ecological receptors at risk and using available chemical methods, ecological surveys and ecotoxicity tests. 650 $aEnvironmental assessment 650 $aContaminação 650 $aMetal 650 $aToxidez 700 1 $aMOREIRA-SANTOS, M. 700 1 $aRIBEIRO, R. 700 1 $aRUTGERS, M. 700 1 $aNOGUEIRA, M. A. 700 1 $aSILVA, E. M. da 700 1 $aSOUSA, J. P. 773 $tPlos One$gv. 10, n. 11, p. 1-25, Nov. 2015.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Soja (CNPSO) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|